home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Turnbull China Bikeride / Turnbull China Bikeride - Disc 2.iso / BARNET / ARMLINUX / MAIL / 9710 / 000114_owner-linux-arm…r.rutgers.edu _Tue Oct 28 12:56:36 1997.msg < prev    next >
Internet Message Format  |  1997-11-30  |  2KB

  1. Return-Path: <owner-linux-arm-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu>
  2. Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6])
  3.     by odie.barnet.ac.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA04885
  4.     for <willy@odie.fluff.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 12:56:35 GMT
  5. Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu ident: root [port 17952]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <1471-27915>; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 14:55:43 +0200
  6. Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <971884-245>; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 07:52:47 -0500
  7. Received: from rocky.linklaters.com ([194.129.194.2] HELO rocky.linklaters.com ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 53356]) by vger.rutgers.edu with SMTP id <971877-245>; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 07:52:32 -0500
  8. Received: by rocky.linklaters.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
  9.     id MAA08681; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 12:54:34 GMT
  10. Received: from colmail(194.203.226.2) by rocky via smap (V2.0beta)
  11.     id xma008652; Tue, 28 Oct 97 12:54:06 GMT
  12. Received: from manning (manning [194.203.226.3])
  13.     by colmail (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA15873;
  14.     Tue, 28 Oct 1997 12:53:41 GMT
  15. Message-Id: <199710281253.MAA15873@colmail>
  16. Received: by manning (NX5.67f2/NX3.0X)
  17.     id AA04633; Tue, 28 Oct 97 12:53:38 GMT
  18. From: Daniel Shimmin <dshimmin@linklaters.com>
  19. Date:     Tue, 28 Oct 1997 12:53:33 +0000
  20. To: David Alan Gilbert <dg@cogency.co.uk>
  21. Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  22. Subject: Re: StrongARM in light of Digital/Intel agreement
  23. X-Pge: 0,ipswich878043138.424.5,0,0,manning878043015.543.2488
  24. Received: by NeXT.Mailer (MindShare 3.61)
  25. X-Mailer: MindShare 3.61
  26. X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  27. Sender: owner-linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
  28. Precedence: bulk
  29. Status: RO
  30.  
  31. > Does anyone on the list know what position this puts the
  32. > StrongARM in?
  33.  
  34. Intel takes over StrongARM production as well, from what I've
  35. heard (third-hand rumour, mind you...)
  36.  
  37. dgs